Project brief / field note 10

Bring the operating problem. Build the brief together.

Use the prompts below to organise what you know, then call, email, or send the short project form. Unknown answers are fine; the first goal is to understand the problem clearly enough to choose a useful next step.

The ten-question brief

A clear starting packet.

Copy these headings into an email. Short, factual answers are more useful than a polished proposal.

01 / person

Who is trying to finish the work?

Name the user, role, Australian operating location, device and access needs.

02 / trigger

What starts the journey?

A request, order, document, event, deadline or status change.

03 / finish

What proves completion?

Name the record, message, approval, payment or state that counts as done.

04 / failure

Where does it break now?

Describe delay, duplicate work, missing state, risk or an unavailable system—not just “manual”.

05 / systems

What owns the truth?

List current applications, spreadsheets, files, vendors and access owners.

06 / preserve

What cannot be lost?

Data, URLs, rules, uptime, analytics identity, audit history or familiar staff workflow.

07 / data

Which people and records are involved?

Note sensitive fields, vendors, access, retention, AI use and incident ownership.

08 / money

Does value change hands?

Name seller, customer, currency, provider, receipts, refunds and tax/accounting owner.

09 / clocks

Where and when does the work operate?

Provide Australian city, US/client collaborators, deadline, live windows and release/support ownership.

10 / specialist

Which conclusions need another owner?

Flag legal, tax, privacy, accessibility, security, language or regulated-industry review.

Example structure

One paragraph can be enough.

Use this pattern without inventing facts:

Person + task

“Our [role] in [Australian location] needs to complete [task] using [current tools].”

Failure + impact

“The process currently fails at [handoff] and creates [specific delay, risk or duplicate work].”

Preserve + outcome

“We must preserve [data/system/URL/rule]. We would consider the first improvement successful when [observable evidence].”

Owners + timing

“[Name/role] can make decisions. Our target date is [date], and [owner] handles specialist conclusions and production release.”

What happens next

Discovery before prescription.

A first conversation is for fit and evidence, not a guaranteed scope or result.

Clarify the journey

Identify the real user, failure, system of record and owner.

Inspect available evidence

Review current system behaviour, access, source, data and vendor constraints where authorised.

Propose the smallest coherent move

Define target, exclusions, acceptance, backup, rollback, verification and measurement.

Direct contact

Send what you know.

Faith Forge Labs is based in the United States. Use the verified form, phone, or email; choose the contact path that fits your project.